What We're Praying/Talking About

Our faith in action, or our small contribution in trying to apply what we're taught in Hebrews 5-6 and James 2:17-26 for the benefit of our dear brothers and sisters within the Body of Christ...

August 13, 2009

RFID The Cattle First, Then Tag The Sheeple

For anyone who still doubts that the technology exists to help fulfill the Mark of the Beast prophecy, they need to look no further than this story today.

For anyone who still doubts that it's the kind of technology that could somehow be used to control humans within a population, they need to look no further than this stunning revelation from our current Vice President Joe Biden (made when he was still a Senator):



For anyone who still doubts that this sort of thing is close at hand, they need to read between the lines in this egregious story out of Michigan. The headline of the news article I saw should read:

RFID The Cattle Frist, Then Tag The Sheeple: No Religious Exemptions

Michigan farmers have failed in their attempt to block the introduction of RFID tags for cattle, despite arguments about the cost and their objections on religious grounds since it would violate their beliefs about modern technology.

The case was bought by the Farm-to-Consumer Legal Defence Fund (FTCLDF), representing small farmers in Michigan as well as a group of six Amish farmers; the former concerned about the cost of the tags, while the latter were more worried about the spiritual ramifications brought on by applying numbers to God’s own cattle.

The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) tried to get the case dismissed back in
November last year, but only now has it managed to have the case thrown out on the basis that it is a Michigan ruling and thus subject to state laws, rather than part of any agenda being set by the USDA as part of the National Animal Identification System (NAIS), against which the plaintiff’s case was based.

What's that? You haven't heard about the National Animal Identification System (NAIS) before? Please stop what you're doing then and go back and read the commentary I just published earlier today on the subject for some good background info, or just watch the following two films about why it should be rejected for the abridged version:

National Animal Identification System - Part 1



National Animal Identification System - Part 2



It seems this isn't the only time that Michigan has been in the national spotlight regarding this highly controversial issue. Check out this excellent news feature backed by some phenomenal research and statistics from back in 2008:

National Animal I.D. System



Even in Michigan the law is intended to be voluntary, but the plaintiffs clearly believe that the voluntary status is just a ruse under which a mandatory ruling can be later implemented, which would threaten their livelihoods, or eternal souls, as appropriate. Can you blame them? I think I'd have much the same response. And since when can a person not opt out on the grounds that they have religious objections? That's the part I want us to focus on here.

In fair and balanced reporting, it’s worth noting, as the Judge did, that even Amish cattle already have numbered metal ear studs, so the contention that numbering cattle is against God’s law was already on shaky ground in the state's eyes. Even so, that doesn't change the fact that this plan in Michigan as well as the NAIS is something we all need to remain very concerned about.

As for the USDA agenda, RFID Journal
covers the case in some detail including quotes from a Michigan representative explaining:

"We implemented this program nearly 10 years ago…This was done pre-NAIS. Michigan is the only state with a mandatory electronic animal-tracking program, but it is also the only state with documented bovine TB cases."

Fine. So why not come up with a program that seeks to prevent and/or eliminate disease? All this does is document and track in a "Big Brother"-esque fashion. That's my problem with this and plans and policies like it -- they don't really do the things they say they're trying to accomplish especially when you put it all under a microscope.

Yes, electronic tracking in this instance (as mentioned in the above quote), doesn’t necessarily mean RFID tags. The same thing can be, and is, achieved using the existing metal studs, with the data gathered electronically whenever the cattle are moved.

Still, is there any doubt that the RFID technology in conjunction with NAIS is where this is heading, and where they want this to go? Such assurances to the contrary provide for good sound bytes for public relations, but they're hardly going to dent this case which is entirely about a power grab and greater federal control.

Let's keep an eye on this especially given what we know about the end times from the Book of Daniel, which seems very appropriate lately:

Daniel 7:25 -- "And he shall speak great words against the most High, and shall wear out the saints of the most High, and think to change times and laws: and they shall be given into his hand until a time and times and the dividing of time." (emphasis mine)

Even more sobering than that is the thought that this is precisely the kind of technology and program that could be modified slightly to include humans rather than animals. Mark of the Beast anyone?

Keep looking up!

SOURCE:
The Register

7 Comments:

njartist said...

Thanks for the info. I sent both postings to my brother in Ohio. I don't know if he will pay atttention.

Carla said...

Hello

I really enjoy your blog. I was wondering if you have noticed the prevalence of media covered car police chases. Whatever the media shows is for a reason whether to indoctrinate or confuse the masses.
God Bless!
CMH

Anonymous said...

In June, my long time Florida vet informed me that he is "reqired by law" to chip my three dogs when they receive their vaccinatins in September. No getting around it or he'll lose his license! Needless to say, I moved to rural Missouri last month, with my chipless dogs, and it was the best thing I ever did. Solitude is priceless! God bless!

Anonymous said...

This is a tough call, JRed. I am inclined to put up as much food and such as possible against what's coming, but at the same time I'm convinced that if I do I won't be here to make use of it. Maybe it'll do some of my family or friends some good when the time comes. Either way, there's gonna be a heck of a mess when they try for their final push. I believe it's why the U.S. won't be a major factor in the end times....it was a country allowed by God and it has turned it's back on God in favor of Government.....God in turn will give this country what it's asking for. Peace, brother.

pk said...

I will never allow my little dog to be chipped due to the cancerous tumors that can develop from these implantations. There may be other devastating results that occur as well. Our bodies (whether human or animal) are not hospitable hosts for a foreign device such as the RFID.

I've wondered if the sores that develop during the tribulation period are a result of the Mark of the Beast RFID implantation:

Revelation 16:2 -

"And the first went, and poured out his vial upon the earth; and there fell a noisome and grievous sore upon the men which had the mark of the beast, and upon them which worshipped his image."

DebinFlorida said...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qTj7nD_h0iI

We are their next intended sacrifices...

Anonymous said...

I am amazed how people so easily give in to the bullying of the federal government. Well, the church cant take the chip and be saved so they will not give in to that. At least those who truly follow Christ.

Look Up Fellowship Media [LUFM]

Listen to internet radio with Look Up Fellowship Media on Blog Talk Radio

Kingdom Bound Radio Archive

I Want To Believe Radio Archive

Right Now Radio Archive

Fair Use Statement

This is a personal blog, but I've been told that I need to include a formal statement of this nature. So, here goes. This website may contain copyrighted material, the use of which may not have been authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in an effort to advance understanding of cultural, economic, environmental, human rights, political, religious, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a "fair use" of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml&#8221. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond "fair use," then you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.